⚠ Superseded · 2026-05-29 compliance-tech pivot
This three-layer thesis is preserved for fundraising context. OilFlow pivoted on 2026-05-29 to compliance tooling for bank, insurer and trading-house compliance teams. Today we sell two things: the Counterparty Screen at $95, machine output on one named counterparty within the hour, and the Counterparty File at $500, the same seven steps plus a written judgement signed by a named person, in the inbox by the end of the third business day. Bank and insurer rollouts, the Workflow Suite and API access carry no list price and are scoped on a call at /apply. Current price list: /pricing. Current company narrative: /about.
Order on one named counterparty
Counterparty Screen$95
One name, delivered within the hour, marked DRAFT for review by independent legal counsel, no human read. PEP is not screened; adverse media is not swept.
Email [email protected] with the product and the counterparty name in the subject. An invoice comes back by reply. Both are prepaid by invoice or marketplace order; there is no card checkout.
HISTORICAL THESIS · PRE-PIVOT
·Original 2026-05-13 · Superseded 2026-05-29
Three-layer infrastructure thesis
The investor-facing statement of what OilFlow was building before the 2026-05-29 compliance-tech pivot. Preserved for historical context.
THE THESIS
OilFlow is the trust, settlement, and data infrastructure for emerging-market physical commodity trade.
A $6 trillion per year cross-border flow underserved by the trading majors, with no shared infrastructure layer today. We are not a marketplace. We are building what Bloomberg did for financial data, what SWIFT did for interbank messaging, and what ICE did for clearing. Applied to emerging-market physical commodity trade.
THE MARKET
$6T per year, captured at the top, abandoned at the bottom.
Global physical oil and gas trade is about $6T per year in cross-border flow (crude ~$1.8T, refined ~$2T, LNG and pipeline gas ~$1T, petrochemicals ~$1T, bunkers ~$0.5T). The trading majors own infrastructure: storage, ships, terminals, relationship moats with national oil companies, proprietary risk books. They win because of that, not because of price discovery.
$6T
per year
Global physical oil and gas trade, cross-border flow
~30%
of flow
Captured by the five trading majors who own the infrastructure
~70%
of profit pool
Concentrated in those same five majors (≈$50 to 100B/yr EBITDA)
$2 to 3T
per year
Addressable wedge for shared infrastructure (the other 70% of flow)
The other 70% of flow (sub-$20M cargoes, EM-to-EM trade, smaller refineries, non-rated counterparties) runs on a long tail of independent brokers operating over WhatsApp, email, and phone. Against bank counterparties that will not issue Letters of Credit for unrated parties. There is no shared trust infrastructure, no shared settlement infrastructure, and no shared data infrastructure. That $2 to 3T per year addressable wedge is what OilFlow is building toward.
THE THREE LAYERS
Trust today. Settlement next. Data after.
Three monetization streams stacked on the same flow. Each layer unlocks the next. Each is a separate moat.
Layer L1
· LIVE
Trust
Built
80%
What it is
Counterparty verification, sanctions screening against 8 lists (OFAC SDN + OFAC Consolidated + UN + EU + UK + Canadian SEMA + Australian DFAT + Swiss SECO), fail-closed NCNDA gating, a 235-jurisdiction regulatory matrix, broker-scam pattern detection, circumvention monitoring.
What's shipped
The 7-step KYC pipeline. The regulatory matrix. NCNDA gating with no bypass. Multi-broker commission split tracking. Sanctions feeds wired and continuously updated. About 80% of the L1 surface is shipped and operational.
Monetizes
Live today
We sell two things off this layer. The Counterparty Screen at $95 is machine output on one named counterparty, delivered within the hour, marked DRAFT for review by independent legal counsel. The Counterparty File at $500 is the same seven steps plus a written judgement signed by a named person, in the inbox by the end of the third business day or the fee is refunded in full. Both are ordered by email to [email protected] and we invoice. Bank and insurer rollouts and API access carry no list price and are scoped on a call at /apply. The marketplace deal fee retired with the marketplace.
Why it's a moat
Regulatory data compounds. Every country added, every sanction signature integrated, every fraud pattern detected raises the cost of any competitor matching it. An institution that wires our screening into its own onboarding locks in by integration cost.
Comparable
Plaid · Refinitiv World-Check · Moody's BvD
Layer L2
· IN DEV
Settlement
What it is
Escrow on cargoes, LC orchestration with partner banks, atomic delivery-vs-payment, deal-room messaging, document execution via DocuSign JWT, inspection routing, demurrage tracking, dispute mediation.
What's shipped
DocuSign integration. Deal-room messaging with realtime and 15MB attachments. Automated DRAFT contract generation, for review by independent legal counsel, covering five pre-cargo documents: SPA, NCNDA, Letter of Intent, Soft Corporate Offer and Full Corporate Offer. Two further generators were retired on 2026-09-16 because OilFlow's own fraud research treats their document chain as a fraud-procedure signal. Q88 inspection parser. Partner-bank coordination workflow. Money does not yet move through the platform, by design.
Monetizes
Target Q3-2026
White-label escrow via one partner bank (initial target: Mashreq Bank UAE), starting on cargoes under $20M. Take rate of 0.25 to 0.50% on settled flow, in addition to the L1 matching fee. Float earned on escrowed funds.
Why it's a moat
Settlement has bilateral network effects. Each partner bank brings counterparties. Each counterparty makes the next partner bank easier to onboard. Switching cost is high once a trade-finance workflow runs through the platform.
Comparable
SWIFT · ICE clearing
Layer L3
· ROADMAP
Data
Built
5%
What it is
Proprietary trade data on EM corridors: real transaction prices, volumes, counterparty pairings, freight rates, payment terms, inspection outcomes. Credit scoring on EM counterparties that today have no rating. Corridor-specific price indices and counterparty risk indices.
What's shipped
The schema. Every deal, NCNDA signature, inspection upload, and payment outcome is captured. About 5% of L3 is built. The pipeline exists. No product yet.
Monetizes
Target Q4-2026
Subscription product at $5 to 50K per seat per year for traders, banks, insurers, and governments. The unique offering is EM-corridor coverage that Platts, Argus, and S&P Global do not provide at depth.
Why it's a moat
A proprietary dataset that grows with every deal processed, compounded by L1 and L2 flow. A new competitor needs to either rebuild L1 and L2 (a multi-year exercise) or license OilFlow's data.
Comparable
Bloomberg · MSCI · Platts / Argus on corridor depth
SEQUENCING
One layer at a time.
The three layers must be sequenced, not parallelized. Attempting all three in 18 months on a seed round is how this fails. Pre-seed companies that try to build infrastructure on multiple layers simultaneously do not survive their first major outage.
Phase 01
Months 0 to 9
Lock L1
Prove the trust layer is the standard for EM counterparty verification. Land the first 10 deals through the platform. Sign the first paid KYC-as-API pilot.
Phase 02
Months 9 to 18
Open L2
White-label escrow live with one partner bank on cargoes under $20M. Real money moves through OilFlow infrastructure. Series A on three proof points (matching plus KYC-as-API plus escrow).
Phase 03
Months 18 to 36
Productize L3
First paid market-intel subscription lands. Series B on settlement-layer expansion and data-product growth.
VALUATION ARC
Infrastructure multiples, not marketplace multiples.
Marketplaces cap at 5 to 10x revenue. Infrastructure plays (ICE, CME, Bloomberg, MSCI, SWIFT) are valued on flow plus clearing plus data plus regulatory moats. The arc below assumes the three-layer thesis executes against the comparables it actually shares.
| Stage | Timing | Valuation | Comparable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seed (grant) | Now | $20 to 30M post-money implied | |
| Series A | Month 18 | $80 to 150M post-money | Plaid Series A; Marqeta Series A |
| Series B | Year 3 | $400M to 1B post-money | Plaid Series B; Stripe Series B; ICE early |
| Series C / IPO-eligible | Year 7 | $2 to 5B | MSCI early; ICE 2005; Marqeta IPO |
| Mature | Year 12 | $20 to 50B | ICE today; Bloomberg; CME |
| Trillion-dollar trajectory | Year 20 to 25 | $100B to 1T | SWIFT-equivalent for EM physical commodity trade |
Trillion-dollar trajectory is conditional on capturing 5 to 10% of $8T flow plus monopoly position on data plus clearing. It is a 20 to 25 year horizon, not a base-case assumption.
LIABILITY BOUNDARIES
What we deliberately do not do.
The thesis is built explicitly on the principle that trust comes from clean liability boundaries, not from regulatory ambition that outruns the company's ability to honor it.
Every AI-generated document ships as a DRAFT with a counsel-review disclaimer.
HONEST CURRENT STATE
Pre-revenue. Zero verified members in production. Zero closed deals through the platform. $0 MRR. L1 is approximately 80% built and operational. L3 is approximately 5% built. The founder is currently brokering one Jet A-1 deal manually, outside the platform, expected to close this month. That deal will be the first end-to-end run through OilFlow's L1 and L1.5 infrastructure as a proof point.
The $800K grant we are raising funds the next 18 months to lock L1 dominance in EM physical oil and gas counterparty verification, sign the first paid KYC-as-API institutional pilot, open white-label escrow with one partner bank, and reach Series A metrics framed as infrastructure flow plus take rate plus data subscriptions. Not marketplace ARR.